API Idempotency
A clear, practical guide to understanding idempotent APIs, why they matter, how to design them, and common patterns for building safe, resilient backend systems.
Introduction
Modern distributed systems rarely behave perfectly. Network retries, timeouts, client crashes, and duplicated requests happen every day. Without proper safeguards, these issues can lead to:
- duplicate payments
- multiple orders being placed
- inconsistent database states
- corrupted user data
- race conditions
Idempotency is a design principle that ensures multiple identical requests have the same effect as a single request. When used correctly, it significantly improves API reliability and protects against unintended repeated operations.
What is Idempotency?
An operation is idempotent if repeating it does not change the result beyond the initial application.
Example: Idempotent
GET /users/123→ always safe to repeatPUT /users/123with the same payload → same result every timeDELETE /cart/1→ deleting the same cart twice still results in it being deleted
Example: Non-idempotent
POST /orders→ creates a new order each time, so retries can cause duplicates
Why Idempotency Matters
Idempotency is critical for safe API design because:
- Networks retry requests automatically
- Mobile clients often lose connection mid-request
- Users double‑tap buttons or refresh pages
- Message queues redeliver messages
Without idempotency, systems become vulnerable to incorrect behavior, especially in payment systems and transactional workflows.
Designing Idempotent APIs
Use Idempotency Keys (Best Practice)
Clients generate a unique key for a specific operation and send it with the request.
The server checks if the idempotency key has been seen before and, if so, returns the stored result, otherwise it processes the operation and stores the outcome for future retries.
Example: Header
Benefits
- Prevents duplicate operations
- Works perfectly for
POSTendpoints (e.g., payments, orders) - Safe for mobile or flaky network scenarios
Challenges
- Requires persistent storage (Redis is common)
- Keys must expire eventually
Best For
- Payments
- Creating orders
- Creating resources with side effects
Make POST Idempotent by Using Client-Generated Resource IDs
Instead of POST /orders, use PUT /orders/{client_generated_id}.
If the client retries with the same ID, the server creates the same resource rather than duplicating it.
Benefits
- Pure HTTP semantics (PUT is naturally idempotent)
- Easy to track and deduplicate
Challenges
- Clients must manage unique IDs
Best For
- Order creation
- Resource creation APIs
Ensure PUT and DELETE Are Truly Idempotent
PUT should:
- Replace the resource
- Return the same output for repeated identical calls
DELETE should return:
200or204if deleted204if already deleted
Common Pitfall
Making PUT behave like PATCH accidentally.
Safe Retry Patterns
Retries must avoid executing logic more than once.
Examples: Safe Patterns
- Using database constraints (
unique order_id) - Using Redis locks (
SETNX) - Using message deduplication keys for queues
- Using optimistic concurrency (ETags, version numbers)
Safe API Design Principles
Principle 1: Avoid Side Effects on GET
GET should never:
- create records
- mutate data
- trigger payments
Principle 2: Use the Right HTTP Methods
- GET: read-only
- PUT: replace a resource
- PATCH: partial update
- DELETE: removal
- POST: create / perform non-idempotent actions
Principle 3: Use ETags for Concurrency Control
ETags prevent overwriting changes made by other clients.
Example:
Principle 4: Validate Inputs Strictly
Never trust:
- client-generated prices
- user-provided IDs without verification
- client-calculated totals in purchases
Principle 5: Use Consistent Error Codes
Consistent error responses help clients implement stable retry logic.
Common Real‑World Examples
Payments
Payment providers (Stripe, PayPal) rely heavily on idempotency keys to prevent double-charging.
Order Systems
E-commerce backends use idempotent order creation to avoid duplicate orders caused by retries.
Messaging & Queues
Message queues retry deliveries; idempotent handlers prevent duplicate side effects.
File Uploads
Chunked uploads require idempotent operations per chunk.
Conclusion
Idempotency and safe API design are essential for building reliable, user-friendly, and fault-tolerant systems. By designing APIs that can safely handle retries, duplicate calls, and network unpredictability, you significantly reduce bugs, prevent catastrophic issues like duplicate payments, and ensure your platform behaves consistently in real-world environments.
Understanding and applying idempotency principles makes you a stronger backend engineer and improves the long‑term stability of any distributed system.
References
AWS Architecture Blog: Making retries safe with idempotent APIs